From 52beb04b70f172ae1228038708e85a1117a2281e387057752ffe57f4f5f720b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Johnson Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Subject: Correct usage of hyphen, em dash, and en dash --- content/entry/antinatalism.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'content/entry/antinatalism.md') diff --git a/content/entry/antinatalism.md b/content/entry/antinatalism.md index 5d1a2e1..e569ce7 100644 --- a/content/entry/antinatalism.md +++ b/content/entry/antinatalism.md @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ Benatar has cited [historical evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinatali ## Famine Relief David Benatar also argues that: -> "...in a situation where a huge number of people live in poverty, we should cease procreation and divert these resources, that would have been used to raise our own children, to the poor." - Wikipedia, licensed CC-BY-SA 3.0 +> "...in a situation where a huge number of people live in poverty, we should cease procreation and divert these resources, that would have been used to raise our own children, to the poor." — Wikipedia, licensed CC-BY-SA 3.0 To create a new being and increase overconsumption and overpopulation without confidence that the new being would enjoy life all at the cost of being able to definitively improve the life of an already existing person seems selfish. So I agree. It's better to spend your resources on something that definitely reduces suffering and increases well-being without creating extra problems. So that wraps up Benatar's arguments. -- cgit v1.2.3