From fb7f329460d8116e80b52034ebe9cef21fc80673c27bcc374b667241f5095e41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Johnson Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000 Subject: Upgrade journal theme --- content/entry/doublethink.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'content/entry/doublethink.md') diff --git a/content/entry/doublethink.md b/content/entry/doublethink.md index 4dc399a..487d924 100644 --- a/content/entry/doublethink.md +++ b/content/entry/doublethink.md @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ title: "Doublethink" date: 2020-06-14T00:00:00 draft: false +makerefs: false --- # Quick Note As a quick note, what people post online is often taken as something they will forever agree with and are forever held to. This is unreasonable. There needs to be some equivalent of forgiveness if one posts something horrible online, but that's a topic for another post. I'm not saying people aren't responsible for what they post. But I am saying we should aspire to take the most charitable interpretation of what people post if we care about advancing the conversation. Obviously a person's character is a factor in how you interpret what they post. -- cgit v1.2.3