From 1026603aae0cbf763fa1dcd204230329f0386ae1cea85d7cd2758ed3222f581b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Johnson Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Subject: Replace instances of 'anyways' with 'anyway' 'anyway' is the correct spelling. --- content/entry/goodbye-pgp.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'content/entry/goodbye-pgp.md') diff --git a/content/entry/goodbye-pgp.md b/content/entry/goodbye-pgp.md index 579385e..0b1f89d 100644 --- a/content/entry/goodbye-pgp.md +++ b/content/entry/goodbye-pgp.md @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ The OpenPGP format combines [compression and encryption](https://security.stacke ## No Deniability PGP does not have [cryptographic deniability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deniable_encryption) even though it could be implemented. Anyone who receives a signed message from you can prove to others you sent it. -For email encryption, it hardly even matters that PGP lacks deniability. Any half decent email server uses DKIM anyways, which can and has been used to prove email provenance. Unless your email provider rotates and publishes DKIM keys, and most don't, then your emails aren't deniable. +For email encryption, it hardly even matters that PGP lacks deniability. Any half decent email server uses DKIM anyway, which can and has been used to prove email provenance. Unless your email provider rotates and publishes DKIM keys, and most don't, then your emails aren't deniable. There's also contextual information in the email content along with metadata and IP logs that prove your emails are yours. So the addition of a PGP signature probably doesn't make a practical difference. -- cgit v1.2.3