From 52beb04b70f172ae1228038708e85a1117a2281e387057752ffe57f4f5f720b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Johnson Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Subject: Correct usage of hyphen, em dash, and en dash --- ...cessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'content/entry/its-not-necessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md') diff --git a/content/entry/its-not-necessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md b/content/entry/its-not-necessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md index 36c4b57..1633ecb 100644 --- a/content/entry/its-not-necessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md +++ b/content/entry/its-not-necessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ There's this idea that people who can't defend a belief to others are always unj > > If this finding ends up being generally an approximation of how our brains work, it could explain a lot about what's happening to global conversations, particularly around the Internet and on social media specifically. It also suggests a possible solution; make the data quickly available. Make it as seamless as possible to re-load those facts and figures into your working memory, and make it as unpleasant as possible to rely on shortcuts and logical tricks when arguing a point." > -> - TameAntelope +> — TameAntelope TameAntelope hits the nail on the head here. Believing something you cannot justify to others isn't necessarily irrational. If you recall a time when you did have all the relevant facts and figures in your head, and computed the conclusion, then it does make sense to stick to that conclusion even after you've long forgotten the justification for it. -- cgit v1.2.3