From fb7f329460d8116e80b52034ebe9cef21fc80673c27bcc374b667241f5095e41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Johnson Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0000 Subject: Upgrade journal theme --- content/entry/metaethics.md | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'content/entry/metaethics.md') diff --git a/content/entry/metaethics.md b/content/entry/metaethics.md index 9ef19c0..a2bb77e 100644 --- a/content/entry/metaethics.md +++ b/content/entry/metaethics.md @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ title: "Metaethics" date: 2020-10-11T00:00:00 draft: false +makerefs: false --- I'm going to talk about metaethics using the 3 questions posed by Bernard Rosen and Richard Garner. The first part is moral semantics. Moral semantics asks how we should interpret moral language, words like good, evil, right, wrong and ought. The next is moral ontology. Moral ontology asks about the nature of moral judgments. Are there many kinds of moral judgments? Are those judgments true for everyone or only specific groups? Lastly, there is moral epistemology. It talks about what we can know about morality and how we know it, irrespective of its nature. For instance, how can we justify our moral judgments to others? I'll start with moral semantics. Without defining the semantics, nothing else in this post would have any meaning. -- cgit v1.2.3