From fae9e6595cb1424643d8df62bdcf165af8699bb42edf70efa15573b8972e5d93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicholas Johnson Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0000 Subject: Make correction --- content/entry/automation-and-the-meaning-of-work.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'content') diff --git a/content/entry/automation-and-the-meaning-of-work.md b/content/entry/automation-and-the-meaning-of-work.md index 5d42f5c..248e22e 100644 --- a/content/entry/automation-and-the-meaning-of-work.md +++ b/content/entry/automation-and-the-meaning-of-work.md @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ The third category of work is where the human prefers doing the work but the ben If it were me, I'd feel bad for the neurosurgeon, but I'm not taking any chances with my brain. That's assuming human neurosurgeons are still an option, which they probably won't be since economics will force them out. -So what's going to happen to people who spend years studying to perform skilled labor only to have that labor automated? This is why artists unhappy with AI art. People are investing lots of time, energy, and money into learning a skill that the market won't have any human demand for. +So what's going to happen to people who spend years studying to perform skilled labor only to have that labor automated? This is why artists are unhappy with AI art. People are investing lots of time, energy, and money into learning a skill that the market won't have any human demand for. These would-be skilled workers need to be compensated with some economic incentive. Without an incentive, people will reason that there's no point in studying for a job that might not exist by the time they finish their education. If that job isn't promptly automated, there could be a massive skilled labor shortage. -- cgit v1.2.3