summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicholas Johnson <nick@nicholasjohnson.ch>2023-02-14 00:00:00 +0000
committerNicholas Johnson <nick@nicholasjohnson.ch>2023-02-14 00:00:00 +0000
commiteeb545eb531c6a75cf33e26a5e2cc76d54922f09b96c31e4ff3607788892ab9d (patch)
tree4b2d68aa95e24504d7af9aba3d34a9057ab8c1052bbbd6884732b849be60db5f
parent8ffcb04f81e9a3ba6340aca2503c1af1641d062af8d76d233a720c42c3dc1f4d (diff)
downloadjournal-eeb545eb531c6a75cf33e26a5e2cc76d54922f09b96c31e4ff3607788892ab9d.tar.gz
journal-eeb545eb531c6a75cf33e26a5e2cc76d54922f09b96c31e4ff3607788892ab9d.zip
Convert refs: thoughts-on-blogging
-rw-r--r--content/entry/thoughts-on-blogging.md13
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/thoughts-on-blogging.md b/content/entry/thoughts-on-blogging.md
index 116950b..83a7b93 100644
--- a/content/entry/thoughts-on-blogging.md
+++ b/content/entry/thoughts-on-blogging.md
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
title: "Thoughts on Blogging"
date: 2020-09-22T00:00:00
draft: false
-makerefs: false
---
# Writing a Blog
I'll start off by saying what this post is not. I'm not going to give any thoughts on how to organize a blog. I'm also not going to give any advice on blog topics, the technical details of running a blog on the web, etc. This post is more about what I believe to be good rules of thumb and things to keep in mind when running a blog. There are going to be exceptions and circumstances where my ideas don't apply. But, on the whole, you should still consider the following if you run a blog.
@@ -14,7 +13,7 @@ I'm not advocating for self-censorship. I'm also not advocating avoiding controv
With all that said, it's also true that the internet has made us less able to forgive. Memory plays a huge role in forgiveness. Before the internet and smartphones, when you did something foolish or said something regrettable, the people that saw or heard it would forget about it. The memory would fade away. Even if they shared your mistake with someone else, that someone couldn't really "relive" the experience. It was just their recollection of events transmitted via spoken words.
-With the internet, your mistakes are permanent. Anything you do or say can be recorded and stored forever, and you can never take it back. It's also harder for others to forgive and forget because your mistake is digitally preserved in video, audio, text and other formats. It can be easily shared with an unlimited number of people. To see the full impact of this, all you have to do is look at the high-profile suicide of Amanda Todd[1]. She was a 15-year old Canadian student that was cyberbullied with nude pictures of herself that got screen captured. Those pictures followed her ultimately driving her to suicide.
+With the internet, your mistakes are permanent. Anything you do or say can be recorded and stored forever, and you can never take it back. It's also harder for others to forgive and forget because your mistake is digitally preserved in video, audio, text and other formats. It can be easily shared with an unlimited number of people. To see the full impact of this, all you have to do is look at [the high-profile suicide of Amanda Todd](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Amanda_Todd). She was a 15-year old Canadian student that was cyberbullied with nude pictures of herself that got screen captured. Those pictures followed her ultimately driving her to suicide.
## The Importance of Forgiveness
My point is, if someone says or does something regrettable and it gets digitally captured and put on the internet, whether or not they meant to upload it, it doesn't make sense to judge them by that forever. Amanda Todd is an extreme case and I'm not equivocating her suicide with intentionally publishing content in blogging. I'm just pointing out that the internet is an unforgiving place when it comes to making mistakes whether that is a mistake on your blog or leaked nude photos.
@@ -29,14 +28,8 @@ You should still try to limit the number of mistakes you make on your blog. One
## Changing Your Mind
Even if you try your best to limit the number of mistakes you make, errors will slip in anyway. A common feature of honest intellectuals and good bloggers is an ability to admit past errors without hang up. If you write a post that isn't true and later learn that it's bad information, you can edit the original post or make a new post correcting your mistake. Crucially, it shouldn't be a big deal for you to do that. In the intellectual world, we are all working to promote good ideas and get rid of bad ones. It's wrong to think of changing one's mind as being "wishy washy". When you get new information that contradicts what you previously thought, changing your mind is the appropriate thing to do.
-Lead member of the United States Coronavirus Task Force Anthony Fauci[2] garnered criticism from the White House for telling people not to wear masks early on in the Coronavirus pandemic and various other "mistakes". The criticism he received and continues to receive over his "mistakes" is absurd because at the time and context in which he made those "mistakes", the information he had available was very limited and pointed to the same advice he was giving. So, the "mistakes" he is being accused of aren't even mistakes. They were the right calls to make at the time. After receiving new information, he "updated" his advice to fit the new evidence about the virus.
+Lead member of the United States Coronavirus Task Force [Anthony Fauci](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_S._Fauci) garnered criticism from the White House for telling people not to wear masks early on in the Coronavirus pandemic and various other "mistakes". The criticism he received and continues to receive over his "mistakes" is absurd because at the time and context in which he made those "mistakes", the information he had available was very limited and pointed to the same advice he was giving. So, the "mistakes" he is being accused of aren't even mistakes. They were the right calls to make at the time. After receiving new information, he "updated" his advice to fit the new evidence about the virus.
-This shows that changing your mind doesn't mean you made an error. Maybe the information you posted on your blog was the best available information at the time and it just so happens that it got updated since you posted it. Since I wrote my post about Zoom[3] there has been news about it that I left out. This doesn't mean what I wrote is wrong, just outdated. In a certain sense, everything you post will soon be outdated just because of how language evolves. To be a rational thinking person is to change your mind sometimes, so get used to the idea that it might happen in your blog. You are under no obligation to continue believing the same things.
+This shows that changing your mind doesn't mean you made an error. Maybe the information you posted on your blog was the best available information at the time and it just so happens that it got updated since you posted it. Since I wrote [my post about Zoom](/2020/05/23/exposing-zoom/) there has been news about it that I left out. This doesn't mean what I wrote is wrong, just outdated. In a certain sense, everything you post will soon be outdated just because of how language evolves. To be a rational thinking person is to change your mind sometimes, so get used to the idea that it might happen in your blog. You are under no obligation to continue believing the same things.
Those are my thoughts on blogging. I hope they are useful.
-
-
-Link(s):
-[1: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Amanda_Todd](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Amanda_Todd)
-[2: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_S._Fauci](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_S._Fauci)
-[3: /2020/05/23/exposing-zoom/](/2020/05/23/exposing-zoom/)