Fix spelling error

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/content/entry/antinatalism.md b/content/entry/antinatalism.md
index 006bd06..14e0e14 100644
--- a/content/entry/antinatalism.md
+++ b/content/entry/antinatalism.md
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ For your next project, you create Earth 2.0, a duplicate Earth. You populate it
 Now according to Benatar, making the people of Earth happy was a very good thing because they already existed. But creating a second, duplicate Earth full of happy beings would've been just as good as never having done so. What a bizarre value system. I suspect if people actually understand the implications of Benatar's asymmetry, very few would agree with it.
 
 ### Intuition Smuggling
-Benetar goes on to offer 4 other asymmetries to explain his intuitions. I won't cover all of them in detail. I just want to point out how they fall apart when analyzed closely. Basically he's using the technique of trying to smuggle in intuitions we have about the real world and using them in a context where they don't apply.
+Benatar goes on to offer 4 other asymmetries to explain his intuitions. I won't cover all of them in detail. I just want to point out how they fall apart when analyzed closely. Basically he's using the technique of trying to smuggle in intuitions we have about the real world and using them in a context where they don't apply.
 
 For example, Benatar thinks since you don't see anything wrong with not creating more happy beings, you agree with him that there's nothing wrong with the absence of pleasure when there's no one to miss out. But not so fast! Why do we have the intuition that not having children is ethically neutral?