Remove erroneous whitespace from Markdown files

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/content/entry/on-nick-bostrom.md b/content/entry/on-nick-bostrom.md
index e38a404..a95cd66 100644
--- a/content/entry/on-nick-bostrom.md
+++ b/content/entry/on-nick-bostrom.md
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ draft: false
 For those who don't know [Nick Bostrom](https://nickbostrom.com), I'll include a snippet of his bio on his website:
 
 > "Nick Bostrom is a Swedish-born philosopher with a background in theoretical physics, computational neuroscience, logic, and artificial intelligence, as well as philosophy. He is the most-cited professional philosopher in the world under the age of 50.
-> 
+>
 > He is a Professor at Oxford University, where he heads the Future of Humanity Institute as its founding director. He is the author of some 200 publications, including Anthropic Bias (2002), Global Catastrophic Risks (2008), Human Enhancement (2009), and Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies (2014), a New York Times bestseller which helped spark a global conversation about the future of AI. He has also published a series of influential papers, including ones that introduced the simulation argument (2003) and the concept of existential risk (2002).
-> 
+>
 > Bostrom’s academic work has been translated into more than 30 languages. He is a repeat main TED speaker and has been interviewed more than 1,000 times by various media. He has been on Foreign Policy’s Top 100 Global Thinkers list twice and was included in Prospect’s World Thinkers list, the youngest person in the top 15. As a graduate student he dabbled in stand-up comedy on the London circuit, but he has since reconnected with the heavy gloom of his Swedish roots."
 
 Bostrom is obviously a very accomplished guy. I believe I first discovered him through his oft-misunderstood paper on the [Simulation Argument](https://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.pdf). I studied his simulation argument and its criticisms very closely. After many hours of researching criticisms and his responses to criticisms, I concluded that his argument is sound and even intuitive if you change your perspective to 4th-dimensional thinking. He adequately addressed some of the criticisms in his own responses and for those criticisms he didn't address, I was able to come up with my own responses.