summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/entry/integrated-activism.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/entry/integrated-activism.md')
-rw-r--r--content/entry/integrated-activism.md4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/integrated-activism.md b/content/entry/integrated-activism.md
index db1dcf0..f17e18a 100644
--- a/content/entry/integrated-activism.md
+++ b/content/entry/integrated-activism.md
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ date: 2021-06-30T00:00:00
draft: false
---
# Tunnel Vision
-The very first thing I want to talk about to kick off this post is something in activism that I call "tunnel vision". It happens when an activist judges the morality of every social situation through the lens of their preferred social causes only, neglecting other relevant social concerns.
+The very first thing I want to talk about to kick off this post is something in activism that I call "tunnel vision". It happens when an activist judges the morality of every social situation through the lens of their preferred social causes only, neglecting other relevant social concerns.
## Cryptocurrency
To break that down, let's think about cryptocurrency. Proponents of proof-of-work based blockchain cryptocurrencies often highlight the benefits. For instance, the blockchain's decentralized nature, resilience against various attack vectors, privacy benefits, freedom benefits, etc. But they either fail to mention or brush off its environmental impact and tax implications.
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ The difference between darknet communities and cryptocurrency communities as I s
There's a lot going wrong in the world and, as an activist, there are infinite social issues worth fighting for. Some of them conflict with each other. So the question becomes how to deal with conflicting social issues. Because the alternative is just ignoring them. It's just having tunnel vision.
## Clever Solutions
-Sometimes there are clever ways to get around conflicts of interest between two social issues. For instance, using proof-of-stake consensus for blockchains instead of proof-of-work mitigates the energy consumption problem of cryptocurrencies. It preserves the good qualities of cryptocurrency while mitigating the purely bad qualities.
+Sometimes there are clever ways to get around conflicts of interest between two social issues. For instance, using proof-of-stake consensus for blockchains instead of proof-of-work mitigates the energy consumption problem of cryptocurrencies. It preserves the good qualities of cryptocurrency while mitigating the purely bad qualities.
## Hard Conflicts
### Darknets - Good and Bad Content