summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/entry/its-not-necessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/entry/its-not-necessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md')
-rw-r--r--content/entry/its-not-necessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/its-not-necessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md b/content/entry/its-not-necessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md
index 2222068..7330f0b 100644
--- a/content/entry/its-not-necessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md
+++ b/content/entry/its-not-necessarily-irrational-to-believe-things-you-cant-justify-to-others.md
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
title: "It's Not Necessarily Irrational to Believe Things You Can't Justify to Others"
date: 2022-04-12T00:00:00
draft: false
+makerefs: false
---
There's a certain mistake seasoned debaters often make when interacting with lay people and the mistake is that just because the unprepared lay person cannot presently argue a point, the seasoned debater concludes they hold that belief without justification. I'll explain why this conclusion isn't necessarily correct.