summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/entry/metaethics.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/entry/metaethics.md')
-rw-r--r--content/entry/metaethics.md1
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/metaethics.md b/content/entry/metaethics.md
index 6c6c0a5..9ef19c0 100644
--- a/content/entry/metaethics.md
+++ b/content/entry/metaethics.md
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
title: "Metaethics"
date: 2020-10-11T00:00:00
draft: false
-pageinfo: true
---
I'm going to talk about metaethics using the 3 questions posed by Bernard Rosen and Richard Garner. The first part is moral semantics. Moral semantics asks how we should interpret moral language, words like good, evil, right, wrong and ought. The next is moral ontology. Moral ontology asks about the nature of moral judgments. Are there many kinds of moral judgments? Are those judgments true for everyone or only specific groups? Lastly, there is moral epistemology. It talks about what we can know about morality and how we know it, irrespective of its nature. For instance, how can we justify our moral judgments to others? I'll start with moral semantics. Without defining the semantics, nothing else in this post would have any meaning.