summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/entry/shining-light-on-the-dark-side-of-law-enforcement.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/entry/shining-light-on-the-dark-side-of-law-enforcement.md')
-rw-r--r--content/entry/shining-light-on-the-dark-side-of-law-enforcement.md1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/shining-light-on-the-dark-side-of-law-enforcement.md b/content/entry/shining-light-on-the-dark-side-of-law-enforcement.md
index 18fbb92..2b4e27d 100644
--- a/content/entry/shining-light-on-the-dark-side-of-law-enforcement.md
+++ b/content/entry/shining-light-on-the-dark-side-of-law-enforcement.md
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
title: "Shining Light on the Dark Side of Law Enforcement"
date: 2020-12-04T00:00:00
draft: false
+pageinfo: true
---
The US constitution is supposed to protect citizens from thug[1] overreach. However, evidence from the past decade shows that thugs have been stomping all over our civil liberties daily by colluding with intelligence agencies. The federal government does this by constructing lies about how agents discover information. For example if the government discovers a crime through illegal mass surveillance or another covert surveillance program, it can't use that evidence directly because that would violate the 4th amendment and expose Big Brother. Instead, "hints" are passed on to thugs so they can construct a "parallel" chain of evidence that can be used in court. This is where it gets the name parallel construction[2]. Parallel construction sounds like innocuous jargon from an architecture course, so I prefer to call the practice by the more descriptive name, evidence laundering.