summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/entry/the-meaning-of-life.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/entry/the-meaning-of-life.md')
-rw-r--r--content/entry/the-meaning-of-life.md4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/the-meaning-of-life.md b/content/entry/the-meaning-of-life.md
index 7eab70f..6d947f0 100644
--- a/content/entry/the-meaning-of-life.md
+++ b/content/entry/the-meaning-of-life.md
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ date: 2021-03-04T00:00:00
draft: false
---
# Disclaimer
-I said in a [previous post](/2021/01/17/on-spirituality) that posts tagged spirituality aren't to be interpreted as [truth-apt](https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803105953845) and that I wanted to be clearer about how to interpret these posts. Well this post is an exception. Do interpret it as making truth claims. I'm going to be more rigorous than I normally am in spiritual posts and try not to make any false claims. So let's get started.
+I said in a [previous post](/2021/01/17/on-spirituality/) that posts tagged spirituality aren't to be interpreted as [truth-apt](https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803105953845) and that I wanted to be clearer about how to interpret these posts. Well this post is an exception. Do interpret it as making truth claims. I'm going to be more rigorous than I normally am in spiritual posts and try not to make any false claims. So let's get started.
# The Meaning of Life
It's 42, obviously.
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ This bias is human nature. It remains true across every culture and every societ
Now, we have scientific explanations for life and the atheists among us have "outgrown" the god hypothesis. And as we learned Darwinian evolution produced life and not a god, we had to think of alternative sources of morality and meaning because god no longer existed in our minds to provide us those things. I've already talked about a moral framework based on hypothetical imperatives which is universal and does not require a god. See the link below.
-[Metaethics](/2020/10/11/metaethics)
+[Metaethics](/2020/10/11/metaethics/)
So, morality is safe despite a godless world. But meaning is different. It doesn't seem so easily replaced. At least, the strong sense of ultimate purpose we had before seems difficult to replace. The basic problem is this: There's nothing "written in the clouds" telling us the point of life is. Nothing about the way the world is tells us how it should be (morality) and nothing about the way the world is tells us what matters in it (meaning), and it seems that nothing ever could.