summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/entry/why-i-dont-have-a-smartphone.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/entry/why-i-dont-have-a-smartphone.md')
-rw-r--r--content/entry/why-i-dont-have-a-smartphone.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/why-i-dont-have-a-smartphone.md b/content/entry/why-i-dont-have-a-smartphone.md
index 9bc01d2..6ff4f7b 100644
--- a/content/entry/why-i-dont-have-a-smartphone.md
+++ b/content/entry/why-i-dont-have-a-smartphone.md
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Regular readers of this journal are probably wondering when I'm going to mention
## Smartphones Are Surveillance Devices
Well actually no. It's possible to have a smartphone that isn't a mass surveillance device. When I had the Google Pixel, I enabled airplane mode and MAC randomization. I used free software from F-droid exclusively. Traffic was onion-routed via Tor. Bluetooth was disabled and wifi as well when I wasn't using it. [I taped both front and rear cameras.](/2021/04/07/cover-your-cameras/) So privacy wasn't an issue for me.
-The average person's smartphone is a surveillance device with dozens of proprietary apps tracking them every which way and a crippled, vendor-locked excuse for the latest version of Android. As for iPhones, there's no excuse for having that trash. They're even worse for your freedom than vendor-locked Androids.
+The average person's smartphone is a surveillance device with dozens of proprietary apps tracking them every which way and a crippled, vendor-locked excuse for the latest version of Android. As for iPhones, there's no excuse for having that trash. They're even worse for your freedom than vendor-locked Androids.
Non-techies don't know how to protect themselves from mass surveillance, so surveillance still counts as a reason for others not to have a phone.