summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicholas Johnson <mail@nicholasjohnson.ch>2024-10-22 00:00:00 +0000
committerNicholas Johnson <mail@nicholasjohnson.ch>2024-10-22 00:00:00 +0000
commit8f4fe2f7e821644bb46a5a91d980913808f48770b80b85582349739835fe8b16 (patch)
tree084afcdeb46407893456742361cd334839a7a74d082452421418e9ca8f7e705b
parent6a42c156e3383e140c4bd9beaa26153267e6a8efe62beef1265dca31ad1b36b5 (diff)
downloadjournal-8f4fe2f7e821644bb46a5a91d980913808f48770b80b85582349739835fe8b16.tar.gz
journal-8f4fe2f7e821644bb46a5a91d980913808f48770b80b85582349739835fe8b16.zip
Add criticism of The Alt-Right Playbook
-rw-r--r--content/entry/playlist-the-alt-right-playbook.md2
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/playlist-the-alt-right-playbook.md b/content/entry/playlist-the-alt-right-playbook.md
index 5e15844..95ba047 100644
--- a/content/entry/playlist-the-alt-right-playbook.md
+++ b/content/entry/playlist-the-alt-right-playbook.md
@@ -8,3 +8,5 @@ draft: false
For people like me who try to build their worldview upon logic and reasoning rather emotions, it's very hard for me to relate to the styles of "debate" that appeal to the alt-right. To someone like me, it just makes them look like non-credible fools. But clearly, their networks of idiotic propaganda *are* appealing to many people. So it makes sense to try to understand how and why it works.
This is the best resource I've found for that.
+
+Edit (22-10-2024): The alt-right playbook contains some big oversimplifications and outright misrepresentations of politics. I also don't like how the tone is also unnecessarily smug. However, it's still useful for understanding the alt-right's style of "debate".