diff options
author | Nicholas Johnson <nick@nicksphere.ch> | 2022-05-23 00:00:00 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nicholas Johnson <nick@nicksphere.ch> | 2022-05-23 00:00:00 +0000 |
commit | 05fa3051e12acddfe320912a93e1927bcf1b64f6df2a14589594144df3b9f3e2 (patch) | |
tree | e2f767706bbef2caf24a3fd5ea9147f6866d3fef2c0e732f9b481932e87d67ea /content/entry/banning-facial-recognition-isnt-enough.md | |
parent | 44ef9882132619ead1f888778804893d848b7686a4833e038b67b263165eb933 (diff) | |
download | journal-05fa3051e12acddfe320912a93e1927bcf1b64f6df2a14589594144df3b9f3e2.tar.gz journal-05fa3051e12acddfe320912a93e1927bcf1b64f6df2a14589594144df3b9f3e2.zip |
Fix spelling errors
Diffstat (limited to 'content/entry/banning-facial-recognition-isnt-enough.md')
-rw-r--r-- | content/entry/banning-facial-recognition-isnt-enough.md | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/banning-facial-recognition-isnt-enough.md b/content/entry/banning-facial-recognition-isnt-enough.md index 7a37732..e766b6c 100644 --- a/content/entry/banning-facial-recognition-isnt-enough.md +++ b/content/entry/banning-facial-recognition-isnt-enough.md @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ The real motive for mass government surveillance such as law enforcement facial And the real motive for corporate mass surveillance is, boringly, profit. Corporations are psychopathic money-making machines and there's a very strong profit motive to conduct facial recognition surveillance of consumers. It provides them with data on consumers that has great monetary value. -Those are the real reasons behind facial recognition. Don't believe the propoganda from the government, the corporate media or the empire of the megacorporations that facial recognition surveillance is about "safety". It isn't now and never has been. +Those are the real reasons behind facial recognition. Don't believe the propaganda from the government, the corporate media or the empire of the megacorporations that facial recognition surveillance is about "safety". It isn't now and never has been. # Facial Recognition Will Become More Dangerous Stallman's Law says "Now that corporations dominate society and write the laws, each advance or change in technology is an opening for them to further restrict or mistreat its users.". Facial recognition tech is no exception. It will only improve and the government and retailers will use its advances to further suppress dissent and generate profits by invading people's privacy. @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Now I'm not proposing a total ban on private and public use of surveillance came It's all about giving people the freedom to decide whether they consent to surveillance or not. In today's society that freedom is disappearing fast and we need it back. There didn't used to be cameras everywhere polluting the urban and suburban landscape and we don't need them now either. They're too big of a risk. You may see this as an extreme solution, but it's not extreme. It's only far-sighted. -Looking at how facial recognition is already being used for targeted harassment of Uighurs in China, it's not hard to imagine ways in which improved facial recognition technology and other dangerous A.I. could worsen the situation. We need to preemptively stop things like this from happening by more strictly regulating what surveillance cameras are allowed to surveil. Private citizens may still record things in public. My objection isn't to that. It's to persistent, mass scale video surveillance of large public or private areas where people more or less have to be or would strongly desire to be (e.g. at a park or at work). +Looking at how facial recognition is already being used for targeted harassment of Uyghurs in China, it's not hard to imagine ways in which improved facial recognition technology and other dangerous A.I. could worsen the situation. We need to preemptively stop things like this from happening by more strictly regulating what surveillance cameras are allowed to surveil. Private citizens may still record things in public. My objection isn't to that. It's to persistent, mass scale video surveillance of large public or private areas where people more or less have to be or would strongly desire to be (e.g. at a park or at work). ## The Free Market Can't Fix It The reason I'm suggesting government involvement is the free market can't solve the surveillance problem especially when consumers can't afford to shop elsewhere or they live too far. Not to mention free market incentives are what created the problem in the first place. Even if there weren't monopolies preventing competition (e.g. a private versus surveilled shop), that would do nothing to stop employee surveillance. You may be able to choose where you shop, but you can't just decide not to work. That's why there ought to be a generalized law limiting corporate and government ability to use surveillance cameras. |