summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/entry/bringing-civility-to-public-discourse-with-the-steel-man-technique.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicholas Johnson <nick@nicksphere.ch>2022-05-23 00:00:00 +0000
committerNicholas Johnson <nick@nicksphere.ch>2022-05-23 00:00:00 +0000
commit05fa3051e12acddfe320912a93e1927bcf1b64f6df2a14589594144df3b9f3e2 (patch)
treee2f767706bbef2caf24a3fd5ea9147f6866d3fef2c0e732f9b481932e87d67ea /content/entry/bringing-civility-to-public-discourse-with-the-steel-man-technique.md
parent44ef9882132619ead1f888778804893d848b7686a4833e038b67b263165eb933 (diff)
downloadjournal-05fa3051e12acddfe320912a93e1927bcf1b64f6df2a14589594144df3b9f3e2.tar.gz
journal-05fa3051e12acddfe320912a93e1927bcf1b64f6df2a14589594144df3b9f3e2.zip
Fix spelling errors
Diffstat (limited to 'content/entry/bringing-civility-to-public-discourse-with-the-steel-man-technique.md')
-rw-r--r--content/entry/bringing-civility-to-public-discourse-with-the-steel-man-technique.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/bringing-civility-to-public-discourse-with-the-steel-man-technique.md b/content/entry/bringing-civility-to-public-discourse-with-the-steel-man-technique.md
index a1e9748..576735e 100644
--- a/content/entry/bringing-civility-to-public-discourse-with-the-steel-man-technique.md
+++ b/content/entry/bringing-civility-to-public-discourse-with-the-steel-man-technique.md
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ The political situation in the United States right now is tense, to say the leas
Therefore I feel it my duty as a citizen to do what I can to bring people together in these divided times. I don't think it's good to create consensus for the sake of it by suggesting everyone take the middle ground[5]. No, the goal is to collectively arrive at truth, which may or may not lie somewhere in the middle. So in this post I'm going to suggest a technique I think will drastically improve the public discourse which, I feel, is one of America's biggest problems right now.
# The Steel Man Technique
-Philosopher and cognitive scientist Daniel Dennett[6] described a method for arguing with a person that holds opposing views. If you've ever heard of the straw man fallacy[7], it's just the opposite of that. With the straw man, you misrepresent your opponent's argument to make it easier to take down. With the steel man, you face the most charitable interpretation of your oppenent's argument. There are 4 steps to steelmanning as explained by Dennett:
+Philosopher and cognitive scientist Daniel Dennett[6] described a method for arguing with a person that holds opposing views. If you've ever heard of the straw man fallacy[7], it's just the opposite of that. With the straw man, you misrepresent your opponent's argument to make it easier to take down. With the steel man, you face the most charitable interpretation of your opponent's argument. There are 4 steps to steelmanning as explained by Dennett:
1. You should attempt to re-express your target’s position so clearly, vividly, and fairly that your target says, “Thanks, I wish I’d thought of putting it that way."
2. You should list any points of agreement (especially if they are not matters of general or widespread agreement).