diff options
| author | Nicholas Johnson <mail@nicholasjohnson.ch> | 2025-02-05 00:00:00 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Nicholas Johnson <mail@nicholasjohnson.ch> | 2025-02-05 00:00:00 +0000 |
| commit | 1026603aae0cbf763fa1dcd204230329f0386ae1cea85d7cd2758ed3222f581b (patch) | |
| tree | 9c42bbecef1b2aec4db5d5fae512a1773b3fb002a6c0c195d2f6ac7043b34dfe /content/entry/the-privacy-implications-of-weak-ai.md | |
| parent | 7cef74ed8db2b0b6b799b3b0e3a9211e521bd7bd4313e8b9f7b7fcf7ed4cb997 (diff) | |
| download | journal-1026603aae0cbf763fa1dcd204230329f0386ae1cea85d7cd2758ed3222f581b.tar.gz journal-1026603aae0cbf763fa1dcd204230329f0386ae1cea85d7cd2758ed3222f581b.zip | |
Replace instances of 'anyways' with 'anyway'
'anyway' is the correct spelling.
Diffstat (limited to 'content/entry/the-privacy-implications-of-weak-ai.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | content/entry/the-privacy-implications-of-weak-ai.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/the-privacy-implications-of-weak-ai.md b/content/entry/the-privacy-implications-of-weak-ai.md index e7175bd..fcaf2ee 100644 --- a/content/entry/the-privacy-implications-of-weak-ai.md +++ b/content/entry/the-privacy-implications-of-weak-ai.md @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ No matter how accurate future AI Sherlock is, there are a few things that will p * We must educate people about the importance of privacy and create political pressure to protect it. * [more items here...] -If you notice, almost all of the above points are related to preventing data collection and not preventing AI use. AI is just software. To stop people using it would require extremely draconian measures that might undermine privacy anyways. I'm not saying draconian measures protect us from AI will never be justifiable. I'm just saying why resort to that when there are solutions that aren't draconian and will actually allow us to preserve our rights? +If you notice, almost all of the above points are related to preventing data collection and not preventing AI use. AI is just software. To stop people using it would require extremely draconian measures that might undermine privacy anyway. I'm not saying draconian measures protect us from AI will never be justifiable. I'm just saying why resort to that when there are solutions that aren't draconian and will actually allow us to preserve our rights? The best way to stop privacy-invading AI is to stop the data collection. AI needs data to make predictions about people. Without data, AI can't make predictions. We should still allow mass data collection with AI to predict things like the weather. That doesn't violate anyone's privacy. The violation happens when there's collection of personally identifiable data about people, or collection of data which AI can later use to deduce personally identifiable information about people. That is what we have to prevent. |