summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/entry
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicholas Johnson <mail@nicholasjohnson.ch>2024-10-31 00:00:00 +0000
committerNicholas Johnson <mail@nicholasjohnson.ch>2024-10-31 00:00:00 +0000
commitf20cc17cc595be8e7313d24bcff341084e9c62e1962af2b2ef34cf5f85c96f83 (patch)
treef2becfc8405f79e1fd9bcf38bcff467df4839ea1019d5dad5e9592669ca2ba76 /content/entry
parent2ac89b346f016c6a1373b4c09c17c581c015aa2356810d2337da7fd40f45d52f (diff)
downloadjournal-f20cc17cc595be8e7313d24bcff341084e9c62e1962af2b2ef34cf5f85c96f83.tar.gz
journal-f20cc17cc595be8e7313d24bcff341084e9c62e1962af2b2ef34cf5f85c96f83.zip
Link to publication defending zoophilia
Diffstat (limited to 'content/entry')
-rw-r--r--content/entry/is-beastiality-immoral.md2
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/is-beastiality-immoral.md b/content/entry/is-beastiality-immoral.md
index 78b87e3..79dd198 100644
--- a/content/entry/is-beastiality-immoral.md
+++ b/content/entry/is-beastiality-immoral.md
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ draft: false
I already wrote an entry [defending incest](/2021/12/16/there-is-nothing-wrong-with-incest/), so I figured why not write about another sex taboo? This time, I'll be exploring the ethics of beastiality.
# Beastiality
+Edit (31-10-2024): Since writing this entry, a defense of beastiality and, more broadly, zoophilia, was published in the [Journal of Controversial ideas](http://dx.doi.org/10.35995/jci03020005 "Zoophilia Is Morally Permissible"). That publication is more articulate, thought-provoking, comprehensive, and informative than this journal entry. Please read it instead.
+
Is it wrong to have sex with non-human animals?
So to answer this question, I'll start by stating my values. I ultimately value something like increasing well-being and decreasing suffering. So, considering my values, the above inquiry boils down to two questions: