summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/entry/antinatalism.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/entry/antinatalism.md')
-rw-r--r--content/entry/antinatalism.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/antinatalism.md b/content/entry/antinatalism.md
index ca8804e..006bd06 100644
--- a/content/entry/antinatalism.md
+++ b/content/entry/antinatalism.md
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ To create a new being and increase overconsumption and overpopulation without co
I still didn't address the popular arguments other antinatalists make. I'll quickly say something about those.
## Kantian Imperative
-There is the Kantian Imperative. I'm not going to address [Kantian antinatalism](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinatalism#Kantian_imperative) because I don't respect it enough to spend time arguing against it. See my criticism of Kant in metaethics[6].
+There is the Kantian Imperative. I'm not going to address [Kantian antinatalism](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinatalism#Kantian_imperative) because I don't respect it enough to spend time arguing against it. See my criticism of Kant in [metaethics](/2020/10/11/metaethics/).
## Impossibility of Consent
There's also the Impossibility of Consent argument. The argument for not procreating based on [impossibility of consent](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinatalism#Impossibility_of_consent) merely smuggles in the usual reasons we care about consent and takes them completely out of context, the same as Benatar's 4 other asymmetries do.