1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/content/entry/avoid-using-cryptocurrency.md b/content/entry/avoid-using-cryptocurrency.md
index 0f7b081..eca6c4d 100644
--- a/content/entry/avoid-using-cryptocurrency.md
+++ b/content/entry/avoid-using-cryptocurrency.md
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ You could try using only proof of stake cryptos. But, for the most part, those a
 ## Freedom and Privacy Versus Energy Consumption
 We seem to have hit a "hard conflict" as I would put it in my post about [Integrated Activism](/2021/06/30/integrated-activism/). I recommend reading that as it may help understand where I'm coming from in this post. Anyway, I'll borrow a quote from that post here:
 
-> "...you are going to run into situations where two or more social issues are in a "hard conflict" and there's no easy way to respect them all. What you have to do in situations like those is to figure out your priorities." - Me, Integrated Activism
+> "...you are going to run into situations where two or more social issues are in a "hard conflict" and there's no easy way to respect them all. What you have to do in situations like those is to figure out your priorities." — Me, Integrated Activism
 
 In this case, the social issues at conflict are privacy and freedom versus energy consumption. You can either keep your economic privacy and freedom or not encourage a system which wastes obscene amounts of energy. But you can't currently do both. Perhaps once Ethereum, the 2nd most popular cryptocurrency, transitions to proof of stake it will become more feasible to do both, minus the privacy of course. For reference, I talk about this exact solution explicitly in Integrated Activism under the "Clever Solutions" header. However, at present, it's not possible to maintain both freedom and privacy and energy efficiency. So I return to the same question I posed earlier. What should you do in the face of this conflict?