1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/legalize-all-drugs.md b/content/entry/legalize-all-drugs.md
index 564a17a..b1018ab 100644
--- a/content/entry/legalize-all-drugs.md
+++ b/content/entry/legalize-all-drugs.md
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@ date: 2020-11-08T00:00:00
 draft: false
 ---
 # History Lesson
-A century ago, alcohol prohibition in the United States began with the [18th amendment](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution) prohibiting the production, importation and sale of alcoholic beverages and ended in 1933 with the [21st amendment](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-first_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution). The goal of prohibition was to reduce alcohol consumption. While prohibition succeeded in reducing alcohol consumption somewhat, it resulted in many unintended consequences including public health problems, an increase in organized crime, and corruption of law enforcement.
+A century ago, alcohol prohibition in the United States began with the [18th amendment](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution) prohibiting the production, importation and sale of alcoholic beverages and ended in 1933 with the [21st amendment](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-first_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution). The goal of prohibition was to reduce alcohol consumption. While prohibition succeeded in reducing alcohol consumption somewhat, it resulted in many unintended consequences including public health problems, an increase in organized crime, and corruption of law enforcement.
 
-The war on "drugs" only played a small part of law enforcement efforts on the whole until Ronald Reagan was inaugurated in 1981. Reagan expanded the drug war with a focus on criminal penalties instead of treatment. His policies resulted in a massive increase in incarcerations of nonviolent drug users. His wife Nancy Reagan started the [Just Say No](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_Say_No) campaign to teach schoolchildren not to use drugs. It was about as effective at reducing drug use as abstinence-based sex education is at reducing sex. The most popular Just Say No program, [DARE](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_Abuse_Resistance_Education), showed zero effect on drug use according to [20 controlled studies](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-just-say-no-doesnt-work). Perhaps that's because DARE spreads lies and gives children a contorted picture of the war on drugs? In 1986, congress passed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act changing [federal supervised release](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_supervised_release) programs increasing focus on punishment rather than rehabilitation, prohibiting [analogs of controlled substances](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_substance_analog) and requiring [mandatory minimum sentences](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_sentencing) for nonviolent drug users. The sentencing discrepancy between crack and powder cocaine resulted in an uneven increase in incarceration rates for black people. Doesn't that sound familiar?
+The war on "drugs" only played a small part of law enforcement efforts on the whole until Ronald Reagan was inaugurated in 1981. Reagan expanded the drug war with a focus on criminal penalties instead of treatment. His policies resulted in a massive increase in incarcerations of nonviolent drug users. His wife Nancy Reagan started the [Just Say No](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_Say_No) campaign to teach schoolchildren not to use drugs. It was about as effective at reducing drug use as abstinence-based sex education is at reducing sex. The most popular Just Say No program, [DARE](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_Abuse_Resistance_Education), showed zero effect on drug use according to [20 controlled studies](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-just-say-no-doesnt-work/). Perhaps that's because DARE spreads lies and gives children a contorted picture of the war on drugs? In 1986, congress passed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act changing [federal supervised release](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_supervised_release) programs increasing focus on punishment rather than rehabilitation, prohibiting [analogs of controlled substances](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_substance_analog) and requiring [mandatory minimum sentences](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_sentencing) for nonviolent drug users. The sentencing discrepancy between crack and powder cocaine resulted in an uneven increase in incarceration rates for black people. Doesn't that sound familiar?
 
 In 2020, a whole century since the beginning of prohibition era, there are signs that we are finally learning what history has to teach us: The unintended consequences of drug prohibition are worse than the problem it's meant to solve. As of today, medical cannabis use is legalized in 35 states. The recreational use of cannabis is legalized in 15 states. 16 states have decriminalized cannabis use. Up to 40 states might allow some form of [marijuana legalization](https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/20/marijuana-legalization-federal-laws-100688) by the end of 2020. Just a few days ago Oregon became the first state to legalize magic mushrooms for medical use and decriminalize "street drugs". People found in possession of street drugs will face a ticket and a 100 dollar fine rather than a felony. They will optionally be offered treatment. Despite recent progress, the war on "drugs" is still being waged almost 50 years later and drugs are cheaper and easier to acquire than ever. And that's where we're at today.
 
@@ -34,14 +34,14 @@ If you believe that quote, then the war on drugs is the definition of insanity.
 Criminalization also burdens the healthcare system dealing with consequences of unsafe, contaminated drug use. Enforcement against drug paraphernalia causes sharing of needles which spreads disease. This wouldn't be as big of a problem if drugs were legalized since they would be regulated and tested for purity. Places that rely on tourism for economic activity are negatively affected when they are seen as dangerous due to drug cartel activity. Money that is spent on unregulated, illegal drugs can't be spent on regulated, taxable and legal parts of the economy. Minorities and low income groups that are already economically vulnerable are more likely to be arrested for drugs, further decreasing future job prospects. Smaller economies are heavily distorted by the drug war. I could go on forever, but you can see that the drug war makes no sense from an economic standpoint.
 
 ## Reducing Corruption
-Wherever there is an organized illicit drug industry, there is also going to be police corruption. Mexico knows this all too well. In December 2019, [Genaro García Luna](https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/former-mexican-secretary-public-security-arrested-drug-trafficking-conspiracy-and), Mexico's former minister in charge of the federal police for 6 years, was arrested for allegedly taking millions from the Sinaloa cartel in return for safe passage of the cartel's drug shipments and information on other rival cartels. Just last month [General Salvador Cienfuegos Zepeda](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/16/us/mexico-general-cienfuegos-dea.html), Mexico's former army chief for 6 years, was arrested on drug trafficking and money laundering charges. The CIA in the US was allegedly involved in [cocaine trafficking](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_involvement_in_Contra_cocaine_trafficking) in which several investigations ensued.
+Wherever there is an organized illicit drug industry, there is also going to be police corruption. Mexico knows this all too well. In December 2019, [Genaro García Luna](https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/former-mexican-secretary-public-security-arrested-drug-trafficking-conspiracy-and), Mexico's former minister in charge of the federal police for 6 years, was arrested for allegedly taking millions from the Sinaloa cartel in return for safe passage of the cartel's drug shipments and information on other rival cartels. Just last month [General Salvador Cienfuegos Zepeda](https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/16/us/mexico-general-cienfuegos-dea.html), Mexico's former army chief for 6 years, was arrested on drug trafficking and money laundering charges. The CIA in the US was allegedly involved in [cocaine trafficking](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_involvement_in_Contra_cocaine_trafficking) in which several investigations ensued.
 
 The bottom line is dealing with the cartels is mutually beneficial for those in power, so long as they don't get caught. Those in government and the police have all the wrong economic incentives when it comes to the drug war. In some government positions in countries with rampant corruption, it's probably an unwritten job requirement to work with the cartels. We'll probably never know which positions those are for sure though. Corruption happens in the shadows and it's always difficult to produce any concrete evidence. Legalizing drugs would eliminate the cartel's source of profit, which means politicians would no longer have any financial incentive to work with them. It follows that drug-related government and police corruption would decrease.
 
 ## Improved Police-Community Relations
 The war on "drugs" is responsible for police militarization more than anything else. Peaceful protesters and rioters face chemical irritants, armored vehicles and riot gear because the war on "drugs" has ensured police have military-style gear. Police militarization causes officers to view themselves as a confrontational force instead of community-oriented. In the eyes of the citizenry, this makes police look like an occupying force rather than public servants.
 
-I'm not dumping all the blame on cops either. The job of police officers is to enforce the law. When the law is unjust, the police still have to enforce it. It's not fair on them because it makes them look bad. Ending the war on "drugs" would do so much for police-community relations. Children wouldn't have to watch their parents hauled off to jail for choosing to engage in a victimless activity. Families wouldn't be torn apart. Drug-related police corruption would end, as I talked about in the above section. Police departments could shift their resources toward stopping murderers and rapists, people causing real harm to society. Without ending the war on "drugs", public confidence in policing will continue to erode. In the year 2020 where we have [nationwide demonstrations against police brutality](https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/06/12/nationwide-protests-over-police-brutality-continue-cities-across-us-cut-and), the Justice Department declaring NYC, Portland and Seattle "[Anarchist Jurisdictions](https://theintercept.com/2020/09/22/anarchist-jurisdictions-portland-new-york-seattle)", and [police abandoning precincts](https://nypost.com/2020/05/29/minneapolis-police-abandon-precinct-after-protesters-set-it-on-fire), police definitely shouldn't be perpetuating a failed drug war that has lasted half a century and will only further diminish public trust in the police.
+I'm not dumping all the blame on cops either. The job of police officers is to enforce the law. When the law is unjust, the police still have to enforce it. It's not fair on them because it makes them look bad. Ending the war on "drugs" would do so much for police-community relations. Children wouldn't have to watch their parents hauled off to jail for choosing to engage in a victimless activity. Families wouldn't be torn apart. Drug-related police corruption would end, as I talked about in the above section. Police departments could shift their resources toward stopping murderers and rapists, people causing real harm to society. Without ending the war on "drugs", public confidence in policing will continue to erode. In the year 2020 where we have [nationwide demonstrations against police brutality](https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/06/12/nationwide-protests-over-police-brutality-continue-cities-across-us-cut-and), the Justice Department declaring NYC, Portland and Seattle "[Anarchist Jurisdictions](https://theintercept.com/2020/09/22/anarchist-jurisdictions-portland-new-york-seattle/)", and [police abandoning precincts](https://nypost.com/2020/05/29/minneapolis-police-abandon-precinct-after-protesters-set-it-on-fire/), police definitely shouldn't be perpetuating a failed drug war that has lasted half a century and will only further diminish public trust in the police.
 
 ## Why not just Decriminalize?
 In the late 1980's and early 1990's, 1 out of every 10 citizens in Portugal was addicted to heroin. To combat this, Portugal decriminalized all drug use. And it worked. Incarceration rates went down, infectious disease cases of HIV went down, and fatal overdoses went down. Decriminalization wasn't the only thing that changed though. It was accompanied by a culture shift in the public attitude toward drugs and drug addiction. When your country isn't busy locking people up over drugs, it can focus on helpful things like treatment, housing, and employment to help people recover. [Several other countries have ended their war on drugs](https://www.inspiremalibu.com/blog/drug-addiction/10-countries-that-ended-their-war-on-drugs). So why not just decriminalize drugs? Why the need to legalize?
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ If you want to deter drug use, then there are better approaches than not fully l
 Let's move on to regulation. Regulation of drugs is important for ensuring drug quality, fair pricing, safety and education. But it's also probably a good idea not to regulate drugs so heavily that a sizable black market continues to exist. I'm not going to focus on regulation other than to say deciding on the regulations should be an evidence-based process. Lawmakers have almost 50 years of evidence on how not to treat drugs in society, so maybe they can learn from past mistakes and other countries that have decriminalized drugs and come up with regulations as drugs are legalized.
 
 # Drug Education
-As for education, let's talk about some of the things schools shouldn't do. First and foremost, school drug education programs should stop lying to children about drugs. Schools should stop teaching children that every hard drug user is an addict. Schools should stop teaching abstinence as the only practical way of protecting oneself from harmful drugs. And they should stop using green-tinted goggles to mimic the effects of marijuana. Yes, [they actually did that](https://stonerthings.com/do-weed-goggles-work).
+As for education, let's talk about some of the things schools shouldn't do. First and foremost, school drug education programs should stop lying to children about drugs. Schools should stop teaching children that every hard drug user is an addict. Schools should stop teaching abstinence as the only practical way of protecting oneself from harmful drugs. And they should stop using green-tinted goggles to mimic the effects of marijuana. Yes, [they actually did that](https://web.archive.org/web/20220816213426if_/https://stonerthings.com/do-weed-goggles-work/).
 
 So what should schools do? They should tell the truth. They should teach that the war on "drugs" has been one of the greatest moral failures of our time, a colossal waste of money, time, resources and human life that could have been better spent on literally anything else. Education programs should provide a fair-minded, evidence-based view of the advantages and disadvantages of drug use per each drug. Drug education programs need to instruct young adults which drugs are worth doing, which are not, how often and in what setting, once they are of age. Drug education should come before most young adults are offered drugs. Program instructors could be social workers instead of police officers because drug addiction is not a criminal issue. It's a health issue. As we end the war on drugs, social workers should take responsibility for dealing with drug-related issues. Social workers can be trained based on prior drug research and hear testimony from non-addicted healthy drug users and addicts alike so they can get an accurate sense of the positive and negative effects of different drugs. This would put them in a good position to educate youth about drugs.
 
@@ -63,4 +63,4 @@ Now that I've covered a few points on education, how will we convert our current
 
 Legalization should also be accompanied by a culture shift. Once drugs are legalized, drug users won't necessarily be criminals. That will go a long way in making it easier for society not to demonize them. People that use drugs are not "bad people". It's nowhere near that simple. There are as many reasons people use drugs as there are drugs. There are people that use drugs in a healthy, responsible way and people that don't. As I said before, there needs to be more resources for drug users in order to promote responsible use. And it's hard to provide resources for that in a society where drugs are heavily criminalized and stigmatized. In a society where drug use is criminalized and stigmatized, drug users have to hide their drug use from family, friends and strangers for fear of legal and social repercussions. This culture of secrecy causes needless psychological suffering for people that use drugs for the wrong reasons. The social stigma around drug use causes users not to seek out help when they desperately need it. That includes addiction treatment, healthcare and psychiatric help. In a society where drugs are legalized and not stigmatized, none of that would be an issue. Drug users could be more open about their habits and get the resources they need to be responsible without worrying about being shamed or arrested.
 
-The war on "drugs" seems to be coming to an end, albeit slowly. It's not over yet though. If not for the drug war, [Breonna Taylor](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Breonna_Taylor) would still be with us. How many more people are going to have to spend years behind bars and forever be labeled felons for engaging in a victimless activity? How many more honest, otherwise law-abiding citizens are going to die for a war that should never have been waged to begin with? When is the needless violence perpetuated by the war on "drugs" going to finally end? Eventually, there will come a day when the very last person has their life ruined by the war on human beings. I hope that day comes sooner rather than later.
+The war on "drugs" seems to be coming to an end, albeit slowly. It's not over yet though. If not for the drug war, [Breonna Taylor](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Breonna_Taylor) would still be with us. How many more people are going to have to spend years behind bars and forever be labeled felons for engaging in a victimless activity? How many more honest, otherwise law-abiding citizens are going to die for a war that should never have been waged to begin with? When is the needless violence perpetuated by the war on "drugs" going to finally end? Eventually, there will come a day when the very last person has their life ruined by the war on human beings. I hope that day comes sooner rather than later.