summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content/entry/on-cultural-appropriation.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'content/entry/on-cultural-appropriation.md')
-rw-r--r--content/entry/on-cultural-appropriation.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/content/entry/on-cultural-appropriation.md b/content/entry/on-cultural-appropriation.md
index cd6c0c6..dfe8729 100644
--- a/content/entry/on-cultural-appropriation.md
+++ b/content/entry/on-cultural-appropriation.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ draft: false
---
There seems to be moral confusion about why cultural appropriation is bad. I'd like to use this entry to clear that up. We'll start with the Wikipedia definition of cultural appropriation:
-> "Cultural appropriation is the inappropriate or unacknowledged adoption of an element or elements of one culture or identity by members of another culture or identity" - [Wikipedia](https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_appropriation), [CC BY-SA 3.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/)
+> "Cultural appropriation is the inappropriate or unacknowledged adoption of an element or elements of one culture or identity by members of another culture or identity" - [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_appropriation), [CC BY-SA 3.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/)
Let's spend some time on that definition. First of all, it uses the weasel word "[inappropriate](/glossary/)". This is not a straw man picking on a particular definition either. I've seen several online articles accusing people of cultural appropriation that use words like "inappropriate", "offensive", "distasteful", and "disrespectful". These words tell us absolutely nothing about why cultural appropriation is morally wrong.